Determination sheet 1 September 2026 Copenhagen, Denmark — indoors 44 photographs

A crane fly on a wall, keyed to Tipula paludosa

A single male crane fly, photographed on an interior wall over about six hours with a phone. This is the determination in full: what each character rules in or out, what the photographs can bound about its age, and where the evidence stops.

FamilyTipulidaeCertain
GenusTipulaCertain
SexMaleCertain
SpeciesT. paludosaProbable
Body length≈ 20 mmmeasured against a ruler
A crane fly seen from above on a white wall, wings spread, all six long legs extended
The specimen. Dorsal view, 10:24. Grey-brown, plain smoky wings held spread at rest, a darker stripe along the abdomen.
The same insect at a distance, resting near the ceiling
First frame. 09:41, near the ceiling. Enough to place the family; nothing below it.

Running the key

order to genus

A key is a sequence of forced choices, so these steps are numbered: each only makes sense once the one above it is settled. Green dots mark characters visible in the photographs; red squares mark characters that rule something out.

01
Order

Diptera — the true flies

Two features settle the order together, and both are visible in a single macro frame:

  • One pair of wings. Everything else radiating from the thorax is a leg.
  • Halteres present. The small drumstick-shaped knobs behind the wing bases are the reduced hindwings — the defining dipteran character.
Macro of the head and thorax showing a pale drumstick-shaped haltere, a bottle-green eye and a short snout
Plate 1. Head and thorax, 12:20. The pale drumstick at left is a haltere. Note also the bottle-green eye and the short snout (nasus).
02
Family

Tipulidae — crane flies

Long fragile legs are the obvious cue; the wing and head are what make it safe. The characters below follow the family diagnosis in the Cranefly Recording Scheme's introduction.

  • Very long, easily-shed legs with visible tibia–tarsus breaks.
  • A dark pterostigma — the elongate brown patch on the leading edge near the wing tip.
  • Long narrow wings held spread at rest, with the discal cell and branched venation typical of the family.
  • A nasus — the small snout-like projection on the front of the head, visible in Plate 1.
Close-up of the right wing showing the dark pterostigma near the leading edge
Plate 2. Right wing. Smoky membrane, pale streak along the costa, dark pterostigma near the tip.
03
Genus

Tipula — and a large one

Scale does real work here. Measured against a ruler in the same plane, at roughly 7.3 pixels per millimetre, the body runs to about 20 mm head to abdomen tip, with a leg span several times that.

That places it in Tipula sensu stricto — the large, grey-brown, house-entering crane flies — rather than Nephrotoma, which would be boldly yellow and black, or any of the small limoniids.

The crane fly on a wall photographed alongside a paper ruler for scale
Plate 3. Scale frame, 10:33. The ruler sits in a slightly different plane, so treat 20 mm as ±2 — enough for genus, not for anything finer.

Sexing the specimen

a prerequisite, not a detail

Sex has to be established before the species characters mean anything, because several of the standard couplets in Tipula apply to one sex only. Here the abdomen tip answers it immediately.

The male genital capsule photographed nearly face-on from behind, showing a dark central cavity ringed by pale points
Plate 4a. Hypopygium, 15:31, close to face-on: a dark central cavity ringed by pale points at the rim. The hard white oval at the top is a flash highlight on glossy cuticle, not a structure.
A more oblique view of the same genital capsule showing its profile
Plate 4b. The same capsule more obliquely, better for its profile: a pale dorsal lobe, a dark diagonal cleft, a rounded notched lower lobe.

The abdomen ends in a blunt, swollen, glossy chestnut capsule — a hypopygium, the male genital capsule. A female would taper to a hardened, upcurved ovipositor, which is conspicuously absent. This is the single most common sticking point when identifying crane flies from photographs: the abdomen tip is the most obvious thing about them and it is strongly sexually dimorphic, so a male compared against a photograph of a female reads as damaged rather than as the other sex.

Why this doesn't reach a species

Keys do not ask whether the hypopygium is swollen and chestnut. They ask about the shapes of the paired claspers — the gonostyli — and the sclerite between them, as set out in Stubbs & Kramer's key to Tipula. Plate 4a reaches the right aspect but not the resolution: once one bright point on the rim is known to be a reflection, none of the others can be assigned with confidence.

The antennal count

the character that decides it

With the specimen established as a large male Tipula, one countable character separates Tipula paludosa from the rest of the genus.

13 antennal segments is the norm across the genus Tipula; paludosa, with 14, is the exception (NatureSpot; genus account). It is worth being exact about what that means: the count is a test for paludosa against the whole genus, not a two-way choice between paludosa and any single other species. Treating it as the latter is an easy and consequential mistake.

The wing-length character sometimes quoted alongside it — wings shorter than the abdomen in paludosa, as long as the abdomen in T. oleracea — separates females and is no help for a male.

Macro of both antenna bases showing a pale scape and pedicel before the dark flagellum begins
Plate 5a. Antenna bases, 15:59. Scape and pedicel are both pale tan; the flagellum begins abruptly and is dark. The pale/dark boundary is therefore the pedicel–flagellum junction.
Both antennae diverging from the head, the near one in focus and the far one descending below it
Plate 5b. Both antennae, rotated so the near one lies horizontal. They share an origin and diverge — the far one descends to the right. Only the near antenna is counted.
The near antenna straightened, with eleven red ticks marking the joints and blue marks at the flagellum start and tip
Plate 5c. The near antenna alone, straightened. Blue: start of the dark flagellum, and the tip. Eleven red ticks between them, each on a verticil-bearing joint. The far antenna is visible below and carries no tick.

Eleven joints delimit twelve flagellomeres. The first is plainly the longest — about 1.5× its neighbour — which is the detail that makes the base interpretable at all: an unusually short dark piece at the base of an antenna is a pedicel caught in shadow, not a first flagellomere.

Twelve flagellomeres + scape + pedicel = 14

Fourteen antennal segments is the character that marks out Tipula paludosa. This is a measured count on a frame where the base, the joints and the tip are all resolved, and on the antenna nearest the camera with the second one excluded from the field.

This count is unusually sensitive to which frame it is taken from, in a way worth stating plainly. A backlit antenna darkens the pale pedicel until it reads as part of the flagellum, adding a segment that is not there. An antenna angled away from the camera foreshortens the basal segments, compressing exactly the region where the boundary has to be judged. Both errors push the count the same way. The frame used here avoids both: the antenna lies across the plane of the wall, side-lit, sharp from base to tip.

CharacterT. paludosaRest of genusThis specimen
Antennal segments 1413 12 flagellomeres → 14
Female wing length shorter than abdomenvaries n/a — male
Peak flight late Aug – Sept, one generationvaries 1 September
Abundance indoors, September the annual mass emergencescattered —

The date corroborates rather than carries the determination. The first of September sits on the peak emergence of T. paludosa, which has one generation a year and produces the familiar wave of large crane flies entering houses across northern Europe at exactly this time (Cornell CALS). That is an argument from base rates; on its own it would not be enough, and it is precisely the reasoning behind a great many misidentifications — plain-winged beige crane flies are routinely filed under paludosa by default (iNaturalist taxon flag).

Held at probable rather than confirmed for one reason: the terminal flagellomeres shorten toward the tip, and an error of ±1 there cannot be excluded from a photograph. A specimen under a hand lens would remove it.

Age

bounded, not measured

No character in a photograph gives an insect's age in days. What the frames do support is a bracket, read from wear — and for this species the bracket is narrow, because the adult stage is very short.

Tipula paludosa adults do not feed. They emerge on the reserves laid down by the larva, and live roughly 7–14 days; mating and most egg-laying happen within the first 24 hours (Cornell CALS; Northeastern IPM Center). Nearly the whole life of the animal is spent as a larva in soil; the adult is a brief dispersal-and-mating stage.

Not newly emerged. Two things put a floor under the estimate:

Not old either. The wear proxies are all at zero:

Estimate

An early-adult male, most likely one to four days past emergence and within the first half of its adult life. The date supports this independently: the first of September sits at the beginning of the species' emergence period rather than at the end of it.

Two limits on that. Wear is a proxy, not a clock — it accumulates by chance as much as by time, so an unlucky fresh adult can lose a leg on its first night and a sheltered one can stay pristine longer than average. And this individual was indoors, on a smooth wall, out of wind and rain, which is a low-wear environment; the proxies will therefore tend to read younger than they would for an animal of the same age outdoors. The bracket should be taken as the direction of the evidence, not a measurement.

The whole insect from above showing all six legs complete and both wings entire
Plate 6a. Condition, dorsal. All six legs present with intact tarsi; both wings entire and unfrayed. Compare with worn individuals, which typically show missing legs first.
Close view of the thorax showing hardened pigmented cuticle and both halteres
Plate 6b. Condition, thorax. Fully hardened and pigmented cuticle with a defined pattern, and both halteres intact.

Against reference specimens

identified material, both candidate species

Identified reference photographs of T. paludosa and its closest look-alike, T. oleracea, against the same views of this specimen. These confirm genus and sex; they cannot pick the species, and the reason is visible at a glance.

Habitus — the whole animal from above
This specimen photographed from above on a white wall
This specimen Copenhagen, 1 Sept

Grey-brown, plain smoky wings held spread, dark pterostigma, darker stripe along the abdomen.

Reference photograph of Tipula paludosa on vegetation with wings spread
Reference Tipula paludosa

Same proportions, wing carriage and colouring.

Rolf Dietrich Brecher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Reference photograph of a male Tipula oleracea on vegetation
Reference Tipula oleracea ♂

Indistinguishable at this scale — which is the whole difficulty in one picture.

gailhampshire · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Abdomen tip — confirming the sex
This specimen's blunt swollen abdomen tip
This specimen Blunt, swollen, glossy

Matches the male references and looks nothing like a female's tapering ovipositor.

Macro reference photograph of the hypopygium of a male Tipula paludosa
Reference T. paludosa ♂ hypopygium

The same structure on a pinned specimen: paired claspers over a dark central sclerite. This is the level of detail a species key needs.

Colin Legg · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Reference photograph of a male Tipula oleracea showing its blunt abdomen tip
Reference T. oleracea ♂

Blunt-tipped in the same way. The male tip confirms sex, never species.

ImagePerson · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Head and antenna
Macro of this specimen's head showing the green eye, antennae and a haltere
This specimen Head macro

Bottle-green eye, short nasus, beaded antennae with a whorl of bristles per segment.

Lateral macro of this specimen with both antennae held clear of the body
This specimen Lateral, 13:07

Backlit and angled away from the camera — legible, but the wrong geometry for counting segments.

Reference macro of a Tipula oleracea head showing the green eye and antenna
Reference T. oleracea head

Same green eye, same antennal structure. Only the segment count separates them.

Charles J. Sharp · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Method and sources

how this was arrived at
Method
  • 44 phone photographs of one individual, 09:36–16:03 local time, reviewed as contact sheets before any frame was selected.
  • Plates are crops upscaled 2–4× with Lanczos resampling; magnification was kept below the point where JPEG artefacts become structure.
  • Body length estimated by pixel-scaling against a ruler photographed in approximately the same plane.
  • The antenna was isolated by rotating the whole frame until it lay horizontal, then cropping a band narrow enough to exclude the opposite antenna and its shadow.
  • Segment boundaries were marked at fixed coordinates and checked against the image rather than counted by eye alone.
  • Times are local (CEST); the camera names its files in UTC.
Keys

No published key was run against the specimen directly; the characters above are drawn from the secondary sources cited, and the keys listed are what would confirm the determination.

Species accounts